Menu

Discover

All Providers Compare Use Cases Find Your Provider

Solutions

Connect License Watch MCP Partnership Claim Listing Get Listed Verified Listings Pricing

Resources

Blog About Contact
Log in Join free
Confirmo

Confirmo

MiCA-licensed stablecoin payments

VS

Blockonomics

Blockonomics
Fees from
Invoicing 0.8%; Payouts 0.5% + network fee vs 0%–1% + $0
Features

2 shared

2 unique to Confirmo · 1 unique to Blockonomics
Regions

7 shared

3 unique to Blockonomics
Pay methods

2 shared

1 unique to Confirmo · 2 unique to Blockonomics
On licensing

Not enough published data on licensing for a fair verdict — open the full specs below for reference.

Want a personalized shortlist? Get matched
2-minute quiz

Still deciding? Find your perfect match.

Answer a few questions about your business type, volume, and must-have features. We'll recommend the best provider for your specific needs.

Find my match

Free. Takes 2 minutes. No account required.

For developers · MCP

Tired of clicking around? Use our MCP.

Point Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor at our endpoint. compare_providers returns the same data — in one tool call. Free preview, no API key.

See how it works
Show full specs
5 features · 5 payment methods · 10 regions. We don't rank these — they're here for reference.
Confirmo Confirmo
Blockonomics Blockonomics
Quick Facts
Fees
Standard transaction rate
Invoicing 0.8%; Payouts 0.5% + network fee
0%–1% + $0
Settlement
Time to receive funds
Near-instant
Instant
Founded
2014
2014
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
SINGAPORE
Sandbox / Test Mode
—
—
Webhook Support
✓
—
Features
Confirmo leads (4 vs 3)
Crypto Support
✓
✓
High Risk Accepted Unique
✓
—
Instant Payout
✓
✓
Instant Sandbox Unique
—
✓
Low Fees Unique
✓
—
Payment Methods
Blockonomics leads (4 vs 3)
Bitcoin Unique
—
✓
Crypto
✓
✓
Stablecoin Unique
—
✓
Usdc Unique
✓
—
Usdt
✓
✓
Regions
Blockonomics leads (10 vs 7)
Africa
✓
✓
Asia
✓
✓
Europe
✓
✓
Global Unique
—
✓
Latin America
✓
✓
Middle East
✓
✓
North America
✓
✓
Oceania
✓
✓
South America Unique
—
✓
Southeast Asia Unique
—
✓

Confirmo is best when you...

MiCA-licensed stablecoin payments
Need High Risk Accepted
Not available with Blockonomics
Need Low Fees
Not available with Blockonomics
View Confirmo

Blockonomics is best when you...

Need Instant Sandbox
Not available with Confirmo
Want coverage in Global, South America, Southeast Asia
Confirmo doesn't cover these regions
View Blockonomics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Confirmo and Blockonomics?
They share 2 payment methods and 7 regions. Confirmo adds USDC that Blockonomics does not list; Blockonomics adds Bitcoin, Stablecoin that Confirmo does not list; Blockonomics also covers Global, South America and 1 more; only Confirmo offers High Risk Accepted, Low Fees.
Which is cheaper, Confirmo or Blockonomics?
Confirmo has published rates from Invoicing 0.8%; Payouts 0.5% + network fee; Blockonomics has published rates from 0%–1% + $0. Headline rates exclude fixed per-transaction fees, FX and chargeback costs, so model your own mix before deciding.
Where can I use Confirmo and Blockonomics?
Confirmo lists 7 regions and 3 payment methods; Blockonomics lists 10 and 4. both cover Africa, Asia, Europe and 4 more. Check the country list on each profile before onboarding — regional coverage is not the same as local acquiring.
How do Confirmo and Blockonomics compare on integration and settlement?
Confirmo supports webhooks; Confirmo settles in Near-instant, Blockonomics in Instant.

Are you Confirmo or Blockonomics?

Claim your profile to update information, respond to comparisons, and access visitor analytics.

Claim this profile
Compare Other Providers

Data on this page is indicative and may be out of date — always verify fees, coverage, and terms directly with each provider before signing. Comparisons are generated from published data and provider-submitted updates; they are information, not advice or an endorsement. Some outbound links may earn us a referral commission — commissions never influence scores or rankings.

See something wrong? Report inaccurate info →