eMerchantBroker

eMerchantBroker

High-Risk Merchant Accounts

VS

Elavon

Multi-Currency

Elavon
Fees from
From 3.00% per transaction vs 0.16% + $0.25 + interchange
Features

0 shared

2 unique to eMerchantBroker · 3 unique to Elavon
Regions

2 shared

2 unique to eMerchantBroker · 1 unique to Elavon
Pay methods

4 shared

4 unique to eMerchantBroker · 4 unique to Elavon
On settlement

eMerchantBroker settles in 1–2 business days; Elavon settles in 1–2 business days. Verify directly with each provider before signing.

2-minute quiz

Still deciding? Find your perfect match.

Answer a few questions about your business type, volume, and must-have features. We'll recommend the best provider for your specific needs.

Find my match

Free. Takes 2 minutes. No account required.

For developers · MCP

Tired of clicking around? Use our MCP.

Point Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor at our endpoint. compare_providers returns the same data — in one tool call. Free preview, no API key.

See how it works
Show full specs
5 features · 12 payment methods · 5 regions. We don't rank these — they're here for reference.
eMerchantBroker eMerchantBroker
Elavon Elavon
Quick Facts
Fees
Standard transaction rate
From 3.00% per transaction
0.16% + $0.25 + interchange
Settlement
Time to receive funds
1–2 business days
1–2 business days
Founded
2011
1991
Headquarters
Thousand Oaks, California
Atlanta, Georgia
Sandbox / Test Mode
✓
✓
Webhook Support
✓
✓
Features
Elavon leads (3 vs 2)
Crypto Support Unique
✓
—
Enterprise Unique
—
✓
High Risk Accepted Unique
✓
—
Instant Payout Unique
—
✓
Recurring Payments Unique
—
✓
Payment Methods
Ach Unique
✓
—
Amex
✓
✓
Apple Pay Unique
—
✓
Credit Card Unique
✓
—
Crypto Unique
✓
—
Debit Card Unique
✓
—
Diners Unique
—
✓
Discover
✓
✓
Google Pay Unique
—
✓
Jcb Unique
—
✓
Mastercard
✓
✓
Visa
✓
✓
Regions
eMerchantBroker leads (4 vs 3)
Asia Unique
✓
—
Europe
✓
✓
Latin America Unique
—
✓
North America
✓
✓
Oceania Unique
✓
—

eMerchantBroker is best when you...

High-Risk Merchant Accounts
Need Crypto Support
Not available with Elavon
Need High Risk Accepted
Not available with Elavon
Want coverage in Asia, Oceania
Elavon doesn't cover these regions
View eMerchantBroker

Elavon is best when you...

Multi-Currency
Need Enterprise
Not available with eMerchantBroker
Need Instant Payout
Not available with eMerchantBroker
Want coverage in Latin America
eMerchantBroker doesn't cover this region
View Elavon

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between eMerchantBroker and Elavon?
They share 4 payment methods and 2 regions. eMerchantBroker adds ACH, Credit Card, Crypto and 1 more that Elavon does not list; Elavon adds Apple Pay, Diners Club, Google Pay and 1 more that eMerchantBroker does not list; eMerchantBroker also covers Asia, Oceania; Elavon also covers Latin America.
Which is cheaper, eMerchantBroker or Elavon?
eMerchantBroker has published rates from From 3.00% per transaction; Elavon has published rates from 0.16% + $0.25 + interchange. Headline rates exclude fixed per-transaction fees, FX and chargeback costs, so model your own mix before deciding.
Where can I use eMerchantBroker and Elavon?
eMerchantBroker lists 4 regions and 8 payment methods; Elavon lists 3 and 8. both cover Europe, North America. Check the country list on each profile before onboarding — regional coverage is not the same as local acquiring.
How do eMerchantBroker and Elavon compare on integration and settlement?
both offer a sandbox; both support webhooks; eMerchantBroker settles in 1–2 business days, Elavon in 1–2 business days.

Are you eMerchantBroker or Elavon?

Claim your profile to update information, respond to comparisons, and access visitor analytics.

Claim this profile

Data on this page is indicative and may be out of date — always verify fees, coverage, and terms directly with each provider before signing. Comparisons are generated from published data and provider-submitted updates; they are information, not advice or an endorsement. Some outbound links may earn us a referral commission — commissions never influence scores or rankings.

See something wrong? Report inaccurate info →