ePay

ePay

Danish merchants

VS

BTCPay Server

Self-hosted Bitcoin and Lightning payments

BTCPay Server
Fees from
1.45% + DKK 1.95 vs 0% fees (self-hosted software)
Features

0 shared

2 unique to ePay · 3 unique to BTCPay Server
Regions

1 shared

5 unique to BTCPay Server
Pay methods

0 shared

12 unique to ePay · 3 unique to BTCPay Server
On licensing

Not enough published data on licensing for a fair verdict — open the full specs below for reference.

2-minute quiz

Still deciding? Find your perfect match.

Answer a few questions about your business type, volume, and must-have features. We'll recommend the best provider for your specific needs.

Find my match

Free. Takes 2 minutes. No account required.

For developers · MCP

Tired of clicking around? Use our MCP.

Point Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor at our endpoint. compare_providers returns the same data — in one tool call. Free preview, no API key.

See how it works
Show full specs
5 features · 15 payment methods · 6 regions. We don't rank these — they're here for reference.
ePay ePay
BTCPay Server BTCPay Server
Quick Facts
Fees
Standard transaction rate
1.45% + DKK 1.95
0% fees (self-hosted software)
Settlement
Time to receive funds
2–3 business days
Instant
Founded
2001
2017
Headquarters
Aalborg, Denmark
Open Source Project
Sandbox / Test Mode
✓
✓
Webhook Support
✓
✓
Features
BTCPay Server leads (3 vs 2)
Crypto Support Unique
—
✓
High Risk Accepted Unique
—
✓
Low Fees Unique
—
✓
Recurring Payments Unique
✓
—
Startup Friendly Unique
✓
—
Payment Methods
ePay leads (12 vs 3)
Amex Unique
✓
—
Apple Pay Unique
✓
—
Bitcoin Unique
—
✓
Crypto Unique
—
✓
Dankort Unique
✓
—
Diners Unique
✓
—
Google Pay Unique
✓
—
Jcb Unique
✓
—
Lightning Network Unique
—
✓
Maestro Unique
✓
—
Mastercard Unique
✓
—
Mobilepay Unique
✓
—
Swish Unique
✓
—
Vipps Unique
✓
—
Visa Unique
✓
—
Regions
BTCPay Server leads (6 vs 1)
Africa Unique
—
✓
Asia Unique
—
✓
Europe
✓
✓
Latin America Unique
—
✓
North America Unique
—
✓
Oceania Unique
—
✓

ePay is best when you...

Danish merchants
Need Recurring Payments
Not available with BTCPay Server
Need Startup Friendly
Not available with BTCPay Server
View ePay

BTCPay Server is best when you...

Self-hosted Bitcoin and Lightning payments
Need Crypto Support
Not available with ePay
Need High Risk Accepted
Not available with ePay
Want coverage in Africa, Asia, Latin America, North America, Oceania
ePay doesn't cover these regions
View BTCPay Server

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between ePay and BTCPay Server?
They share 0 payment methods and 1 region. ePay adds Amex, Apple Pay, Dankort and 9 more that BTCPay Server does not list; BTCPay Server adds Bitcoin, Crypto, Lightning Network that ePay does not list; BTCPay Server also covers Africa, Asia and 3 more; only ePay offers Recurring Payments, Startup Friendly.
Which is cheaper, ePay or BTCPay Server?
ePay has published rates from 1.45% + DKK 1.95; BTCPay Server has published rates from 0% fees (self-hosted software). Headline rates exclude fixed per-transaction fees, FX and chargeback costs, so model your own mix before deciding.
Where can I use ePay and BTCPay Server?
ePay lists 1 region and 12 payment methods; BTCPay Server lists 6 and 3. both cover Europe. Check the country list on each profile before onboarding — regional coverage is not the same as local acquiring.
How do ePay and BTCPay Server compare on integration and settlement?
both offer a sandbox; both support webhooks; ePay settles in 2–3 business days, BTCPay Server in Instant.

Are you ePay or BTCPay Server?

Claim your profile to update information, respond to comparisons, and access visitor analytics.

Claim this profile

Data on this page is indicative and may be out of date — always verify fees, coverage, and terms directly with each provider before signing. Comparisons are generated from published data and provider-submitted updates; they are information, not advice or an endorsement. Some outbound links may earn us a referral commission — commissions never influence scores or rankings.

See something wrong? Report inaccurate info →